Comments on: Nokia LGPLed Qt http://www.rojtberg.net/190/nokia-lgpled-qt/ Technical Blog of Pavel Rojtberg Thu, 02 Feb 2012 02:15:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Qt sous licence LGPL | Le site de vetetix http://www.rojtberg.net/190/nokia-lgpled-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-1026 Qt sous licence LGPL | Le site de vetetix Sun, 15 Aug 2010 12:22:30 +0000 http://www.rojtberg.net/?p=190#comment-1026 [...] libres, c’est la mise sous licence LGPL du framework Qt. Ils en parlent un peu partout sur les blogs et les sites d’info technologique (pfiou, c’est dur de faire tout plein de liens [...] [...] libres, c’est la mise sous licence LGPL du framework Qt. Ils en parlent un peu partout sur les blogs et les sites d’info technologique (pfiou, c’est dur de faire tout plein de liens [...]

]]> By: Qt sous licence LGPL | Le blog de vetetix http://www.rojtberg.net/190/nokia-lgpled-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-812 Qt sous licence LGPL | Le blog de vetetix Tue, 29 Jun 2010 22:38:03 +0000 http://www.rojtberg.net/?p=190#comment-812 [...] libres, c’est la mise sous licence LGPL du framework Qt. Ils en parlent un peu partout sur les blogs et les sites d’info technologique (pfiou, c’est dur de faire tout plein de liens [...] [...] libres, c’est la mise sous licence LGPL du framework Qt. Ils en parlent un peu partout sur les blogs et les sites d’info technologique (pfiou, c’est dur de faire tout plein de liens [...]

]]> By: Pavel http://www.rojtberg.net/190/nokia-lgpled-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-302 Pavel Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:05:29 +0000 http://www.rojtberg.net/?p=190#comment-302 ah, ok. Such a library will not be much different than where we are today, since it would have to support both the GTK and the Qt functionality and this is basically what qtlibs provide. But if they share more code "qtlibs" will smaller and it will also make it easier to agree on a common theming specification. So in the end you should not see any difference as a user... ah, ok. Such a library will not be much different than where we are today, since it would have to support both the GTK and the Qt functionality and this is basically what qtlibs provide.
But if they share more code “qtlibs” will smaller and it will also make it easier to agree on a common theming specification.
So in the end you should not see any difference as a user…

]]> By: simpsus http://www.rojtberg.net/190/nokia-lgpled-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-301 simpsus Wed, 14 Jan 2009 18:51:37 +0000 http://www.rojtberg.net/?p=190#comment-301 I know the first one and the second one does not seem to have any releases yet, but as far as I understand this is a different approach. They are building a theme that makes qt apps look like gtk. What I mean is an engine (library) that can run both. In other words: If you want to run amarok in gnome, you have to install only amarok, not qtlibs as well (and half of kde, but thats another story) I know the first one and the second one does not seem to have any releases yet, but as far as I understand this is a different approach. They are building a theme that makes qt apps look like gtk. What I mean is an engine (library) that can run both. In other words: If you want to run amarok in gnome, you have to install only amarok, not qtlibs as well (and half of kde, but thats another story)

]]> By: Pavel http://www.rojtberg.net/190/nokia-lgpled-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-300 Pavel Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:16:44 +0000 http://www.rojtberg.net/?p=190#comment-300 yeah I indeed forgot to mention the topic inside the post :D what exactly do you mean by "gtk engine running qt code"? There are already engines which try to map one API to another: <ul> <li><a href="http://gtk-qt.ecs.soton.ac.uk/screenshots.php" rel="nofollow">map GTK to Qt</a></li> <li><a href="http://code.google.com/p/qgtkstyle/" rel="nofollow">map Qt to GTK</a></li> </ul> but what I expect is that both codebases will be merged into one over time... yeah I indeed forgot to mention the topic inside the post :D

what exactly do you mean by “gtk engine running qt code”? There are already engines which try to map one API to another:

but what I expect is that both codebases will be merged into one over time…

]]> By: simpsus http://www.rojtberg.net/190/nokia-lgpled-qt/comment-page-1/#comment-299 simpsus Wed, 14 Jan 2009 13:01:34 +0000 http://www.rojtberg.net/?p=190#comment-299 I think your post is missing a paragraph. The one where Qt is actually released as LGPL. Another issue: I have always wondered why there is no such thing like a gtk engine beeing able to run qt code (or vice versa). Now I understand that this is because of the deep deep differences and not beeing able to share code. Do you think that such an engine is now a) possible and b) probable? I think your post is missing a paragraph. The one where Qt is actually released as LGPL.
Another issue: I have always wondered why there is no such thing like a gtk engine beeing able to run qt code (or vice versa). Now I understand that this is because of the deep deep differences and not beeing able to share code. Do you think that such an engine is now
a) possible and b) probable?

]]>